How re:bug fits into your Dev workflow (A smarter way to report bugs—straight into Jira or Email)
This article explains how re:bug fits into your dev workflow—capturing structured bug reports with screenshots, steps, and system info, and sending them directly to Jira or email.

Bug reports often live in chaos.
Screenshots sent over Slack. Steps hidden in long emails. Reproductions that don’t quite work.
By the time a developer picks up the ticket, they have more questions than answers—and the clock is ticking.
That’s where re:bug comes in—not as a bug tracking tool, but as a smarter way to capture and send structured reports directly to Jira or email.
In this article, we’ll show how re:bug fits into your daily dev workflow, supports seamless communication, and brings clarity to every bug report. Whether you're part of QA, product, or engineering—this is the QA tool your team actually needs.
Why traditional bug reporting slows everyone down
Most teams struggle with:
- No context around the bug
- Vague reproduction steps
- Lost screenshots or missing logs
- Endless ping-pong between QA and devs
- Time wasted deciphering what went wrong
And while some QA tools try to streamline things, few are built with everyone in mind—from the tester to the developer to the product owner.
What makes re:bug different?
re:bug isn’t a bug tracking tool.
It works alongside Jira (or email) and ensures that every issue arrives clean, clear, and ready to fix.
With re:bug you get:
✅ In-app reporting widget (Android version)
✅ Screenshot + annotation tools
✅ Numbered steps to reproduce
✅ Automatic device, OS, and app info
✅ Instant send to Jira or email—no extra setup
In other words, re:bug is the reporting layer before tracking.
How re:bug fits into your Dev workflow
Let’s walk through a typical flow and see where re:bug comes in:
1. During QA testing
- QA finds an issue
- Opens re:bug from within the app
- Takes a screenshot, annotates the issue
- Adds reproduction steps and expected vs. actual behaviour
- Sends it directly to Jira
✅ Result: The dev gets everything they need to fix—no Slack follow-up required.
2. During Beta or UAT
- A PM or tester notices a bug
- Uses re:bug to capture and annotate
- Adds context and sends via email if needed
✅ Result: Clean issue report, even from non-technical users.
3. After launch / In production
- A team member (support, QA, or dev) spots an issue in the live app
- Opens the re:bug widget directly inside the production environment
- Captures the screen, adds notes, and sends to Jira in one click
✅ Result: No missed context, no Slack threads—just fast, structured feedback even in production.
Why Teams Use re:bug
👩💻 Developers love the clarity
✅ QA teams love the speed
📦 PMs love that nothing slips through
🧩 CTOs love the tighter dev workflow
It’s not another tool to learn. It’s the missing piece that makes your stack smarter.
How re:bug complements other QA Tools
Already using automation, test case management, or analytics?
re:bug plays nicely with them all.
Think of it as the bug reporting assistant that works with your existing QA tools—especially when it comes to communicating issues clearly.
Final Thoughts
Bugs will happen. That’s a given.
The real challenge is communicating them effectively—so the right people can fix them, fast.
That’s where re:bug shines:
It integrates into your dev workflow, delivers structured reports straight to Jira or email, and helps your team move faster with fewer misfires.
So the next time someone says, “Can you open a ticket for that?”—you’ll already be done.